http://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/ Exploring The Unknown Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:55:12 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.3 http://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32114 Mon, 21 Oct 2013 10:55:12 +0000 https://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32114 There's been years of tons of extreme weather before humans even existed, no basis just propaganda.

]]> http://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32115 Sun, 20 Oct 2013 02:38:31 +0000 https://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32115 If there's plenty of proof you should be able to provide it quite easily. I notice you avoid doing this
While there will be improvements in understanding there is no chance they are entirely wrong. If we fail to act the best we can hope for is a currently unknown force saving us.
"10 years ago it was confirmed as all linked to sun spot activity"
When? Where? Just hearing one outlier make a claim does not mean it is accepted science. We've known it is most likely man's CO2 for several decades now

]]> http://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32116 Sun, 20 Oct 2013 00:55:31 +0000 https://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32116 There is plenty of proof that climate change is a farce unfortunately as a zealot you only want to hear its all true. Call me back when reality hits 7 they finally admit they had it all wrong. if you remember 10 years ago it was confirmed as all linked to sun spot activity. Natural variations that have never been recorded before are being presented as some kind of calamity

]]> http://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32117 Mon, 14 Oct 2013 20:26:21 +0000 https://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32117 So rather than be able to actually defend your allegations you simply slink off into ad hominems and conspiracy theory. The IPCC scientists are highly qualified, there is not a single substantiated example of lying, nor any evidence grants are made based upon presumed outcome.
You've been conned by the deniers. You should wake up and free yourself from the echochamber

]]> http://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32118 Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:13:53 +0000 https://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32118 I am well aware of how the incompetents are selected. No qualifications no experience, falsify, lie, deceive to get the answer that gets the next grant or pay check. Climate change is a con & a lie wake up

]]> http://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32119 Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:54:07 +0000 https://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32119 You apparently don't know much about the IPCC. They don't hire people. Scientists are put forward by national governments. They volunteer to do the job
John Christy, Richard Lindzen, Roger Pielke Jr., Roy Spencer are among the people who disagree with the IPCC who have been lead author or contributors to the IPCC Report.
You are repeating myths. You should do your own research.

]]> http://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32120 Sun, 06 Oct 2013 11:17:16 +0000 https://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32120 You have the locations to check do it. The IPCC will not hire anyone who's opinion differs from what is expected

]]> http://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32121 Sat, 05 Oct 2013 06:41:47 +0000 https://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32121 "with no anti views allowed to influence the decision"
And the next post you'll be telling me about more IPCC scientists who are skeptics. Would you like me to list all the contrarian scientists who have participated? Or the contrarian papers cited? All you're doing is bitching that because the vast majority of scientist find the AGW evidence compelling they must be blindly following. Meanwhile you continue to cite non-scientists like Rose of the Daily Mail.

]]> http://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32122 Sat, 05 Oct 2013 06:41:39 +0000 https://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32122 "IPCC scientists accept their forecast computers may have exaggerated… – and not taken enough notice of natural variability"
As well noted in the other IPCC reports short term trends can overwhelm CO2 forcing. But then the trend reverses and it exaggerates it just like 1992 through 2006. The long term trend underlies it all. They can't predict short term things like ENSO and said so long ago. It's simply deniers taking an honest report and twisting language

]]> http://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32123 Sat, 05 Oct 2013 06:37:14 +0000 https://paranormalactivity.org/climate-change-affected-half-of-extreme-weather-events-in-2013/#comment-32123 "Scientists…computers may have exaggerated"
You really don't understand climate models do you? Yes it has warmed less than projected in AR4 but that's not surprising as models don't predict short term. The long term the warming trend has barely budged
Models didn't get the 15-year time span covering the years 1992 through 2006 either. During that period the rate of warming was 0.28 deg.C/decade. And if you are looking at the IPCC report you'll see the models are still well within the range

]]>